Some 44 years on, having reached 67 last year, the Oxford retirement age, he had collected 10 honorary degrees and 47 other awards and prizes from some of the world’s leading scientific societies and medical academies. They included: the Royal College of Physicians Baly gold medal in 2001; the Society for Neuroscience’s highest award (2012); China’s highest honour for foreigners (2012); along with American, French, Swiss, Czech and Indian honours. Not bad for a man who was brought up in a humble two up and two down rented house in a poor area of Coventry. The headmaster of the local primary was the first to identify his talent, urging his parents to transfer him to the junior school of the local grammar at the age of nine because no one had passed the 11 plus from the primary.
There was one prize, however, which he did not get: the knighthood which all previous and subsequent heads of the Medical Research Council have received. The scandal was exposed by the Sunday Times, which discovered he had been nominated for the 2004 New Year’s Honours List, only to be eliminated by nervous Whitehall civil servants worried that his research was ‘controversial’. Colin’s response was robust: he threatened to resign declaring his position as chief executive had become untenable: ‘How can I go to our scientists and ask them to risk talking about animal research, when there now appears to be evidence that in secret the government disapproves.’ It prompted open declarations of support for such research from the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser David King, the Science Minister Lord Sainsbury, Prime Minister Tony Blair along with leading UK science institutions. He didn’t get his knighthood, but more importantly he established widespread support for such work when it had been under intense pressure from animal rights activists.
Family under siege
No-one had been subjected to more pressure than Colin Blakemore. His family had endured a decade of assaults. Not just regular non-violent activists protesting outside their Oxford home with speakers, but much more seriously violent extremists who had sent letters laced with razor blades, made threatening phone calls, smashed windows and attempted to pull down the front door, damaged the family car, and sent two bombs through the post (one of which arrived when only the three children and au pair were in the house). The home had to be fitted with panic buttons, triple locks and a safe room. The children had to accept police escorts to their schools, which suffered two bomb threats.
Colin had been advised to keep his head down when he was pinpointed by the protesters. He had refused and insisted on publicly explaining – to journalists, politicians and animal activists – why animal research was needed. It was only allowed by law if there was no other option. The research had been crucial in the creation of antibiotics, insulin, vaccines for polio and cervical cancer, and important in achieving success with organ transplants, heart by-pass surgery and HIV treatment. “Without it, we would – medically speaking – be stuck in the Dark Age.”
He had called for bans on animal testing for cosmetics and helped set up an organisation which brought scientists and anti vivisectionists together to converse. He was a committed humanist and rationalist. But none of this deterred the extremists. His experiments, which required the eyelids of new born kitten to be sewn down, were too good a target. But it was the Blakemore experiments that led to a breakthrough in the diagnosis of amblyopia – the most common form of child blindness.
Ironically, by the time he went to the Medical Research Council in 2003, new laws and key extremists in prison meant the worst was over for the family. Colin was facing a different poisoned chalice. The MRC had just suffered a damning indictment from the Commons select committee on science and technology. It was condemned for poor financial management, misguided research strategies and inadequate communications. The scientists who had provided the evidence were given anonymity for fear of retribution. The Blakemore solution was a mixture of wider consultation, new mechanisms for handling funds, new forms of support for young researchers and an overhaul of communications. Why did he take the post? “Both the challenge and a loyalty to the council. They had helped support my research.” By the time he completed his four-year term, the MRC’s budget was one third higher – over £700 million – its relations with the Department of Health and the burgeoning Wellcome Foundation more amicable, and its communications much more transparent.
A natural communicator he was perfectly equipped to achieve the latter. At the age of 32, he was the youngest person selected to deliver the BBC Reith lectures in 1976. The theme: Mechanisms of the Mind. The Royal Institution Christmas Lectures in 1982-3 followed. Then there was a run of television and radio programmes: a 13-part series, the Mind machine on BBC television; a radio series about artificial intelligence, Machines with Minds; and a channel 4 television programme, God and the Scientists. He has had regular articles in the serious press: Guardian, Observer , Times and Telegraph and a succession of popular science books, some based on his broadcasts others on Gender and Society, Mindwaves, Images and Understanding, and the Oxford Companion to the Body. He was awarded the Royal Society’s Faraday prize and medal in 1989 for his public communication of medicine and science.
Since returning from his Harkness Fellowship, he has divided his time between Cambridge (1968-1979) and Oxford (1979-2012) with breaks for the MRC and visiting fellowships. When he began his studies, neuroscience had yet to be given its name. There are now 70,000 such scientists worldwide. His major contribution to the science is the concept of neuronal plasticity, the capacity of the brain to reorganise itself by the activity passing through its connections. By the late 1960s, he had demonstrated that the visual part of the cerebral cortex undergoes active, adaptive change shortly after birth. Initially controversial, ‘plasticity’ is now a dominant theme in neuroscience. The plasticity of connections between nerve cells is thought to underlie many different types of learning and memory. True to his reputation for challenging orthodoxy, in his Ferrier prize lecture in 2010 on the 350th anniversary of the Royal Society, he argued that far from the growth in the human brain emerging through gradual evolution, something more dramatic happened: a genetic accident. Research suggested the sudden expansion happened about 200,000 years ago. He ruled out evolution because it took almost that time before it became useful. “It’s like arguing a reptile suddenly developed fully formed wings and then sat around for 200,000 years before realising it could fly.” He suggested it was a dramatic spontaneous mutation in the brain. “A change in a single gene would have been enough.”
He has not given up research. He still has access to his Oxford laboratory and has a new post at the University of London as Director of the School of Advanced Study’s Centre for the Study of the Senses. He is the only scientist in the centre but plenty of sympathetic colleagues from cognitive science, psychology, and philosophy particularly with reference to perception. He speaks with enthusiasm about the technical advances of neuroscience over the last 40 years. “What I find most exciting about the science, is that it is starting to touch on what it means to being human.”
He still believes in keeping fit, but after running 18 marathons has stopped such extreme exercise.